Great, provocative question by sustainability scientists Alicia Harley and William C. Clark on Twitter:

Arun Agrawal’s succinct list of answers is an excellent starting point:

I would perhaps also add the corollary to the last point, that therefore “intent” does not necessarily manifest in behavior, particularly when looking at only a small section of time. This is important because to me, a key insight of institutional theory is that assessing or changing people’s beliefs does not necessarily tell you their behavior, or how/if their behavior will change. Beliefs can be part of behavior change, and certainly are related to overall behavior, but in some cases behavior changes beliefs. That is, to minimize cognitive disonance when our actions don’t match our beliefs, sometimes we change our beliefs instead to allow for the actions we’ve already taken, thus alleviating us of the disonance!*

And I suppose lastly, I might add the importance of the thorough rethinking of the “deficit model” of education (where people with “high knowledge”, like scientists, simply transfer/communicate information to people with a “knowledge deficit”). Many alternatives, critiques, and refinements have been offered, and it’s increasingly recognized that simple one-way “education” (e.g. “I, the expert, tell you the right things”) is an ineffective and otherwise faulty way to approach affecting people’s beliefs and behaviors.

What’s your favorite thing that this kind of research has shown us in sustainability science?

 

*NB: It might be equally or more fair to say that “identity changes beliefs”, e.g., identifying as a Democrat or Republican then can lead us to change our beliefs to fit in better with our partisan identification. However, there is evidence of behavior causing alterations in beliefs rather more directly. See e.g. “The Experience of Cognitive Dissonance Can Create Attitude Change” and “We Reduce Dissonance by Decreasing Dissonant or by Increasing Consonant Cognitions” a bit less than halfway down this page of Principles of Social PsychologyThere is more recent research verifying and expanding on these findings, but I don’t have time to look them up now. However, Ellis and Stimson’s Ideology in America is required reading for looking at some parallel elements of partisanship and beliefs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s